AI transparency law stirs controversy The UK’s new Data (Use and Access) Bill, aimed at AI transparency in training models, has passed amid criticism from artists—including Elton John—raising concerns about implications for musicians like McCartney
The UK’s newly passed Data (Use and Access) Bill, designed to promote transparency in artificial intelligence training models, is drawing sharp criticism from prominent musicians. Artists including Elton John have voiced concern over how the legislation could impact copyright protections, with particular attention on its implications for legendary figures like Paul McCartney.
At the heart of the controversy is the bill’s provision allowing AI developers broader access to creative content for training purposes, a move critics say could sideline artists’ rights. Musicians argue that without clearer guidelines or stronger safeguards, the law opens the door to unlicensed use of music in AI-generated content.
McCartney, who has previously expressed both interest and caution around AI’s role in music—especially following the AI-assisted completion of a “final” Beatles song—has not yet publicly commented on the new law. However, industry watchers believe the stakes are high for veteran artists whose extensive catalogs are increasingly being tapped by emerging technologies.
The debate underscores a growing tension between technological innovation and artistic ownership, as lawmakers struggle to keep pace with the rapid evolution of generative AI.
